Mrs. Hillary Clinton
Recent email from B McNasty:
It is important to note that while Hillary is (1) a woman and (2) has witnessed the development, impact, and challenges of policies from a variety of perspectives (first lady, senator, etc.). She is not a product of middle America; she has not struggled with average Americans; she does not embody a feminine or woman-centered approach to politics. She is a divisive leader, and perhaps more importantly her presidency would mark 20+ years of only two families occupying the white house and enjoying executive leadership over this country. This is dangerous, no matter how promising and progressive or effective her candidacy might be (though is not).
Perhaps more important than what Hillary brings to this race in experience and plans is what she does not bring to the race. It is critical that Americans emerge from this administration - which told us to stay afraid, trust unequivocally, and spend lots of money to keep America strong and safe - with a sense of investment and involvement in politics. It is critical that our leaders shape these next years as representatives, not as far-removed, privileged Washingtonites. It is even more important they enlist our participation and our energy. We need leaders with the vision and courage to construct an administration of decision-makers that is not simply bi-partisan but is also inclusive, with both diverse life experiences and political philosophies. While it is my belief that a woman can more readily and effectively embrace these kinds of changes, it is also my belief that Hillary is absolutely not that woman.
Indeed, her ego, while no bigger than any other ego in American politics, is guarded and elevated by her husband's tenure, her alleged participation in his legacy, and an asserted but unfounded clout. She is likely to build an administration of cronies that share her perspective, a trend I cannot trust.
Sticking with Hillary, either based on her proposed policies or her gender (which is reckless), says "I want change, but I'm not really ready for it." It says "I want to be courageous, but I am only willing to support a gradual move away from Bush politics." It's inconsistent to criticize our current state of affairs and to talk of change while standing behind Hillary. It's not a vote for fundamental change; it's a vote for change of appearance.
On another note, I fear that Bill Clinton is eager to again play a role in presidential politics. Aside from mainstream banter that predicts "two presidents in the whitehouse" and "a return to the Bill Clinton legacy," I'm uncomfortable with this potential role for him because it will inevitably distract him from his great work with the Clinton Global Initiative, which is doing remarkable and progressive international work. His leadership is essential as this organization develops and I am fearful, perhaps without reason, that it would take a backseat.
Some final arbitrary feelings:
-I 100% believe the accusation that she makes decisions only after reading the polls. Whatever it takes to keep her in power, to keep her popular, she'll do it.
-I don't like her cackle, it is the biggest fake-laugh-crap I have ever heard.
-While she is a decent talker, she is a terrible public speaker (becoming more and more necessary).
-She embarrasses me as an American (vs. Barack who is the first presidential candidate that the idea of him being president makes me genuinely proud to be an American).
-I don't want more Republicans in the White House and she is going to lose the general election.
Okay, I'm done.
B
Perhaps more important than what Hillary brings to this race in experience and plans is what she does not bring to the race. It is critical that Americans emerge from this administration - which told us to stay afraid, trust unequivocally, and spend lots of money to keep America strong and safe - with a sense of investment and involvement in politics. It is critical that our leaders shape these next years as representatives, not as far-removed, privileged Washingtonites. It is even more important they enlist our participation and our energy. We need leaders with the vision and courage to construct an administration of decision-makers that is not simply bi-partisan but is also inclusive, with both diverse life experiences and political philosophies. While it is my belief that a woman can more readily and effectively embrace these kinds of changes, it is also my belief that Hillary is absolutely not that woman.
Indeed, her ego, while no bigger than any other ego in American politics, is guarded and elevated by her husband's tenure, her alleged participation in his legacy, and an asserted but unfounded clout. She is likely to build an administration of cronies that share her perspective, a trend I cannot trust.
Sticking with Hillary, either based on her proposed policies or her gender (which is reckless), says "I want change, but I'm not really ready for it." It says "I want to be courageous, but I am only willing to support a gradual move away from Bush politics." It's inconsistent to criticize our current state of affairs and to talk of change while standing behind Hillary. It's not a vote for fundamental change; it's a vote for change of appearance.
On another note, I fear that Bill Clinton is eager to again play a role in presidential politics. Aside from mainstream banter that predicts "two presidents in the whitehouse" and "a return to the Bill Clinton legacy," I'm uncomfortable with this potential role for him because it will inevitably distract him from his great work with the Clinton Global Initiative, which is doing remarkable and progressive international work. His leadership is essential as this organization develops and I am fearful, perhaps without reason, that it would take a backseat.
Some final arbitrary feelings:
-I 100% believe the accusation that she makes decisions only after reading the polls. Whatever it takes to keep her in power, to keep her popular, she'll do it.
-I don't like her cackle, it is the biggest fake-laugh-crap I have ever heard.
-While she is a decent talker, she is a terrible public speaker (becoming more and more necessary).
-She embarrasses me as an American (vs. Barack who is the first presidential candidate that the idea of him being president makes me genuinely proud to be an American).
-I don't want more Republicans in the White House and she is going to lose the general election.
Okay, I'm done.
B
posted by gwiemer at 8:25 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home